Taxation logo taxation mission text

Since 1927 the leading authority on tax law, practice and administration

Wrong type of settlement

18 May 2010
Issue: 4255 / Categories: Tax cases
Pitt and another v Holt and another, Chancery Division

The first claimant’s husband was awarded damages in respect of injuries he suffered from a car accident. As receiver for her husband the first claimant put the money in a settlement.

After her husband’s unexpected death HMRC said that the form of the settlement meant that inheritance tax was due on the creation of the settlement on subsequent capital distributions after ten years and on the husband’s death.

The first claimant and her advisers had not considered the inheritance tax position when setting up the trust; had they done so and realised the impact the tax would have on the value of the damages they would have created a different kind of settlement to avoid the problem.

Therefore the first claimant asked to have the settlement unravelled invoking the Hastings-Bass principle (see Re Hastings-Bass deceased [1974] STC 211).

The judge...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxation.co.uk, please click the login box below:

If you are not a subscriber but are a registered user or have a free trial, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this item in full.

Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.

back to top icon