Taxation logo taxation mission text

Since 1927 the leading authority on tax law, practice and administration

Minor to majority

05 January 2010
Issue: 4237 / Categories: Forum & Feedback , Trusts
A trust established in 1994 in favour of the settlor’s minor unmarried son appears to have both possible beneficiaries and immediate beneficiaries

I deal with a trust set up in 1994 where the default beneficiary is the settlor’s minor unmarried son.

One clause states that ‘during the trust period the trustees shall have power by deeds revocable or irrevocable to appoint the trust fund and the income thereof for such one or more of the possible beneficiaries in such one or more shares and for such interests and subject to such trusts powers and provisions (including protective trusts discretionary trusts or powers operative or exercisable at the discretion of the trustees or any other persons) as the trustees in their absolute discretion think fit’.

The settlor is excluded from benefit but his widow is included as one of the possible beneficiaries.

Elsewhere it provides that: ‘subject to and in default of any appointment made under [the above clause] the trustees shall hold the trust fund and the income thereof absolutely...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxation.co.uk, please click the login box below:

If you are not a subscriber but are a registered user or have a free trial, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this item in full.

Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.

back to top icon