Taxation logo taxation mission text

Since 1927 the leading authority on tax law, practice and administration

Residential relief

27 October 2009
Issue: 4229 / Categories: Forum & Feedback , Income Tax
A mother sold a property that was originally her main residence, but which she subsequently allowed her daughter to use. The daughter did not pay rent, but did pay some expenses including a buildings insurance premium.

Our client sold a property previously occupied as her main residence but subsequently occupied rent-free by her daughter who was responsible for all household bills and on at least one occasion paid the buildings insurance which was billed to the owner (her mother). Mother continued to pay for property repairs.

HMRC have opened an enquiry. Main residence relief is agreed but our claim to residential lettings relief under TCGA 1992 s 223(4) has been rejected.

HMRC state that ‘let’ means ‘to grant the temporary possession and use of in consideration of rent or hire’. They do not accept that the payment of annual buildings insurance is sufficient to constitute commercial rent and reject the suggestion that if a rent payment is required it could be a peppercorn.

Apparently ‘the technical position is that where a lower than market rate of rent...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxation.co.uk, please click the login box below:

If you are not a subscriber but are a registered user or have a free trial, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this item in full.

Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.

back to top icon