Taxation logo taxation mission text

Since 1927 the leading authority on tax law, practice and administration

Flimsy basis

18 May 2009
Issue: 4206 / Categories: Tax cases , VAT
Corkteck Ltd v CRC, Queen’s Bench Division, 8 April 2009

The claimant Corkteck was a wholesale supplier of beverages. In 2005 another company Sintra approached Corkteck with a view to buying soft drinks which Corkteck would deliver to Sintra’s customer in Poland.
Corkteck called HMRC’s national advice service for advice on the VAT position.

The customer was VAT registered in Poland but Sintra was not.
The claimant said that HMRC advised that it could use the VAT number of the Polish customer to zero rate the sale.

HMRC’s note of the conversation differed however to the effect that the sale could be zero rated if the conditions in section 3 of notice 725 were met.

This provides that a supply of goods to a VAT-registered customer in another EU state could be made if the supplier obtained and showed on his VAT invoice his customer’s VAT registration number.

Corkteck proceeded to...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxation.co.uk, please click the login box below:

If you are not a subscriber but are a registered user or have a free trial, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this item in full.

Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.

back to top icon