Taxation logo taxation mission text

Since 1927 the leading authority on tax law, practice and administration

Henry VIII reborn

27 May 2008 / Allison Plager
Issue: 4160 / Categories: Comment & Analysis , HMRC powers , Admin
The Whole House debated the new penalty regime proposals in the Finance Bill. ALLISON PLAGER reports

KEY POINTS

  • The Government has gone from a gradualist approach to penalties to a big bang approach
  • The Treasury's powers are too extensive
  • Delaying the new regime would not be helpful

Recalling the fuss over 'HMRC think' which was subsequently dropped from FA 2007 Sch 24 David Gauke proposed amendments to clause 117 'Penalties for errors' in this year's Finance Bill. The amendments would in effect hold back its introduction for a year. 

He said that there were two logical approaches which could be taken on the matter.

First it is 'confusing' to have two different penalty regimes for errors in tax returns and so it would seem sensible to move to a single structure as soon as possible. He described this as a 'big bang approach' to penalties.

The alternative would be to take a slower approach ...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxation.co.uk, please click the login box below:

If you are not a subscriber but are a registered user or have a free trial, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this item in full.

Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.

back to top icon