Taxation logo taxation mission text

Since 1927 the leading authority on tax law, practice and administration

Making your mind up

01 April 2008 / Peter Rayney
Issue: 4152 / Categories: Comment & Analysis , Capital Gains
It may be better to opt out of the automatic deferral treatment for earn-out transactions, says PETER RAYNEY

KEY POINTS

  • The curse of Marren v Ingles
  • Making use of loan notes to take advantage of CGT deferral under TCGA 1992 s 138A
  • Marren v Ingles treatment can be beneficial
  • The impact of entrepreneurs' relief

Over the past few years many owner managers have sold their companies with part of their sale consideration being subject to some form of earn-out arrangement.

Earn-outs are generally employed to reconcile the so-called 'price gap' that often exists between a vendor and purchaser.

The vendor has the ability to receive additional 'deferred' consideration depending on the post-acquisition performance of the target company.

However the purchaser only pays such further amounts (according to a formula) based on the level of profits in the target company delivered by the vendor typically over a two- or three-year period...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxation.co.uk, please click the login box below:

If you are not a subscriber but are a registered user or have a free trial, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this item in full.

Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.

back to top icon