Taxation logo taxation mission text

Since 1927 the leading authority on tax law, practice and administration

UK bound

12 November 2007 / Mike Truman
Categories: Tax cases
The appellant claimed that he left the UK for a year from 6 April 1998 during which time he received a substantial bonus from his UK employer

The appellant was born in Canada but had been resident and ordinarily resident in the UK for many years before 1998-99. He claimed that he left the UK for a year from 6 April 1998 during which time he received a substantial bonus from his UK employer.

From the evidence the Special Commissioner said that this was not a 'distinct break' case in the style of Dave Clark in Reed v Clark [1985] STC 323. This was for several reasons:

  • the appellant continued to be employed by the UK employer and did not have full-time employment abroad;
  • his work remained the same;
  • he did not establish a permanent residence abroad;
  • his family remained in the UK;
  • he did not open a bank account overseas;
  • his centre of vital...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxation.co.uk, please click the login box below:

If you are not a subscriber but are a registered user or have a free trial, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this item in full.

Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.

back to top icon