Taxation logo taxation mission text

Since 1927 the leading authority on tax law, practice and administration

A Nelsonian eye

09 May 2007 / Simon McKie
Issue: 4107 / Categories: Comment & Analysis , HMRC powers , Admin
SIMON McKIE explains why he believes that the extended disclosure rules for tax avoidance schemes hold dangers for all tax practitioners.

Key points * The price of non-disclosure. * Analysis of a tax-planning exercise. * The extent of FA 2004 s 306. * The confidentiality tests. * The prudent approach to disclosure.

IN TAXATION MAGAZINE of 19 October 2006 and 9 November 2006 there appeared in two instalments a slightly shortened version of an article 'Suggestio Falsi' which I had written for Issue 6 (2006) of Private Client Business. That article concerned the extension to the Disclosure of Tax Avoidance Scheme rules which were introduced by regulation with effect from the 1 August 2006. In that article I concluded that the effect of the new rules was that 'almost all the advice which [tax advisers] will give in relation to the prescribed taxes [income tax capital gains tax and corporation tax] will be disclosable'. I attempted to demonstrate that this was the case by showing that an...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxation.co.uk, please click the login box below:

If you are not a subscriber but are a registered user or have a free trial, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this item in full.

Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.

back to top icon