Taxation logo taxation mission text

Since 1927 the leading authority on tax law, practice and administration

It could be you!

08 November 2006
Issue: 4083 / Categories: Forum & Feedback

My limited company client purchased a machine which cost around £20,000. The machine manufacturer ran a business promotion scheme whereby any purchasers, within a specified period, would have their name entered in a draw for a similar machine. My client's name came out of the hat and he now possesses an additional £12,000 machine. My client enquired as to the most tax efficient method of dealing with this transaction.

My limited company client purchased a machine which cost around £20 000. The machine manufacturer ran a business promotion scheme whereby any purchasers within a specified period would have their name entered in a draw for a similar machine. My client's name came out of the hat and he now possesses an additional £12 000 machine. My client enquired as to the most tax efficient method of dealing with this transaction. He suggested that he personally sells the machine to the company and credits his director's loan account with the proceeds thus enabling the company to benefit from capital allowances and he would benefit from the value of the machine. He justifies this by claiming that the true cost of his business production is shielded by the value of this machine if he simply includes it in his business without the business paying for it.
My opinion is...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxation.co.uk, please click the login box below:

If you are not a subscriber but are a registered user or have a free trial, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this item in full.

Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.

back to top icon