Taxation logo taxation mission text

Since 1927 the leading authority on tax law, practice and administration

Stop the carousel!

25 January 2006 / Marc Welby , John O'donnell
Issue: 4042 / Categories: Comment & Analysis , HMRC powers , VAT
MARC WELBY and JOHN O'DONNELL outline the Bond House case and its ramifications

Almost a year after the Advocate General issued an opinion the European Court of Justice ruled on the long-running Bond House case (not to be confused with the London City Bond case which relates to continuing criminal investigations by the police) on 12 January 2006 in a judgment that has serious ramifications for HMRC.

As a direct result of the ruling HMRC face VAT refunds of almost £40 million and the judgment is likely to prompt a rash of similar claims for refunds.

What's it all about?

The Bond House case concerns a type of VAT fraud known as missing trader intra community fraud or carousel fraud prevalent in the mobile phone and computer chip industries.

The European Court's decision deals with three cases referred to it namely Optigen Ltd (C-354-03) Fulcrum Electronics Ltd (C-355/03) and Bond House Systems Limited (C-484/03) all concerning the question...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxation.co.uk, please click the login box below:

If you are not a subscriber but are a registered user or have a free trial, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this item in full.

Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.

back to top icon