Taxation logo taxation mission text

Since 1927 the leading authority on tax law, practice and administration

Inaction better than action?

05 January 2006 / Ian Maston
Issue: 4039 / Categories: Comment & Analysis , Trusts
IAN MASTON discusses a curious Special Commissioner's decision on trustees' discretion powers.

THE DECISION IN Judge & Judge (Exors of Walden deceased) v IRC (SpC506) was released on
5 October 2005. The Special Commissioner Dr Nuala Brice considered whether the Will of Mr Thomas Walden created an interest in possession in his home — 30 Perrymead Street Fulham — in favour of his wife Mrs Pamela Ida Alma Walden.
The property had been owned by Mr Walden in his sole name and the point at issue was that if Mrs Walden had a right to occupy the property she would then (following the decision in Lloyds Private Banking v CIR [1998] STC 559) have an interest in possession in the property and its value would be correspondingly subject to inheritance tax on her death (per IHTA 1984 s 49(1)).
Mr Walden died on 28 January 2000 and the terms of clause 3 of his Will ...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxation.co.uk, please click the login box below:

If you are not a subscriber but are a registered user or have a free trial, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this item in full.

Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.

back to top icon