Taxation logo taxation mission text

Since 1927 the leading authority on tax law, practice and administration

Meeting points

14 July 2005 / Rebecca Cave
Issue: 4016 / Categories: Events , Arctic Systems , Jones v. Garnett
TaxAid conference: Tax Planning for the Family and Family Company, 1 July 2005, reported by REBECCA CAVE FCA, CTA, director of Taxwriter Ltd.

Rebecca Benneyworth lecturer author and sole practitioner.
Andrew Hubbard tax director Tenon Ltd.
Andrew Burgess lecturer with Mercia group.
Mike Truman editor Taxation magazine.

Arctic Systems decision

Andrew Hubbard emphasised that clients in a similar position to Mr and Mrs Jones cannot ignore the judgment in the High Court as it is a binding precedent. However this puts such taxpayers in a difficult position as they must self-assess on a matter even the highest qualified QCs cannot agree on. If the taxpayer declares on his 2005 tax return that all the dividends from the business are taxable on the fee earner then the Court of Appeal changes the decision on the Jones v Garnett appeal case; the taxpayer has until 31 January 2007 to revise his 2005 tax return.


To disclose or not to disclose?

Andrew Hubbard explained the joint Institutes' guidance gives...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxation.co.uk, please click the login box below:

If you are not a subscriber but are a registered user or have a free trial, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this item in full.

Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.

back to top icon